The latest development in this field is the introduction of Google Gemini Ultra, a powerful AI chatbot that claims to outperform the dominant GPT-4. In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll put these two AI giants head-to-head across ten different categories to determine which one truly reigns supreme.
ChatGPT-4 vs Google Gemini Ultra: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Category | GPT-4 Rating | GPT-4 Strengths | Google Gemini Ultra Rating | Google Gemini Ultra Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Text Summarization | 4 stars | Concise & detailed summaries | 4 stars | User-friendly options for modifying responses |
| Writing & Copywriting | 4 stars | Accurate & adheres to word count | 4 stars | Natural & concise emails with CTAs |
| Multimodality & Vision | 5 stars | Unmatched image description & analysis | 1 star | Limited image interpretation |
| Image Generation | 3 stars | Consistent & relevant images | 1 star | Provides concept ideas & links |
| Research & Information Retrieval | 2 stars | Limited hyperlink functionality | 3 stars | Integrates with Google knowledge base & YouTube |
| Creativity & Storytelling | 4 stars | Compelling narratives & character development | 2 stars | Less comprehensive storytelling |
| Coding & Programming | 5 stars | Step-by-step instructions & functional code | 2 stars | Inconsistent performance & errors in code |
| Complex Reasoning & Math | 3 stars | Solves some problems but adds unnecessary context | 3 stars | Clear solutions for some problems |
| Extensions & Custom Functionalities | 3 stars | Vast library of custom GPTs | 3 stars | Powerful extension system for Google Workspace & YouTube |
| Content Creation & Repurposing | 3 stars | Custom GPTs improve capabilities | 3 stars | Concise & engaging social media content |
Limitations and Usability
Before diving into the prompts, it’s essential to address the limitations and usability of both chatbots. GPT-4, with its $20 per month individual plan, is limited to 40 messages every 3 hours. On the other hand, Google Gemini Ultra currently has no known usage limitations. When it comes to privacy, GPT-4’s teams plan allows users to disable conversation data from being used for model training, while Gemini’s privacy settings are yet to be clarified.
Text Summarization
Our first test focuses on text summarization. Both GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra performed exceptionally well when given specific instructions on summary length and style. They provided concise and detailed summaries, showcasing their ability to understand and condense information effectively. However, Gemini Ultra’s quick options for modifying responses and generating multiple drafts give it a slight edge in terms of usability.
Writing and Copywriting
Next, we evaluated the chatbots’ writing and copywriting capabilities. GPT-4 demonstrated accuracy in adhering to word count requirements, while Gemini Ultra provided multiple options with varying focus points. When it came to email writing, Gemini Ultra delivered a more natural and concise response, complete with a clear call to action. Overall, both chatbots performed well, earning them each a 4-star rating in this category.
Multimodality and Vision
Multimodality, the ability to interact with non-textual data like images and videos, is where GPT-4 truly shines. Its vision capabilities are unmatched, accurately describing and analyzing uploaded images. In contrast, Gemini Ultra struggled to interpret images containing people, failing to provide meaningful insights. GPT-4 also outperformed Gemini Ultra in generating HTML and CSS code from a screenshot, showcasing its versatility and adaptability.
Image Generation
Both GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra offer image generation capabilities, but neither can match the photorealistic quality of dedicated tools like Midjourney or Leonardo. GPT-4, powered by Dalle 3, generated more consistent and relevant images based on the given prompts. Gemini Ultra, on the other hand, provided concept ideas and links to other image-creation tools instead of generating the requested image. In this category, GPT-4 earned a 3-star rating, while Gemini Ultra received only 1 star.
Research and Information Retrieval
When it comes to research and information retrieval, Gemini Ultra has a clear advantage due to its integration with Google’s vast knowledge base and YouTube’s extensive library. Gemini Ultra provided clickable links to relevant sources, while GPT-4 often struggled to include functional hyperlinks in its responses. However, both chatbots faced issues with link accuracy, sometimes providing broken or non-existent URLs. Considering the importance of reliable sources in research, Gemini Ultra earned a 3-star rating, while GPT-4 received 2 stars.
Creativity and Storytelling
Creativity is an area where GPT-4 truly excels. When prompted to write a monologue from the perspective of an everyday object or to blend different literary genres, GPT-4 delivered more comprehensive and engaging responses compared to Gemini Ultra. Its ability to develop characters and craft compelling narratives earned it a 4-star rating in this category, while Gemini Ultra received 2 stars.
Coding and Programming
For non-developers, GPT-4 is the clear winner when it comes to coding and programming. When asked to write a Python code for a game of Snake, GPT-4 provided step-by-step instructions, including links to install necessary software and a functional code that ran without issues. Gemini Ultra, on the other hand, struggled to provide clear instructions and generated code with errors. GPT-4’s ability to fix and troubleshoot code further solidifies its dominance in this category, earning it a perfect 5-star rating, while Gemini Ultra received a 2-star rating for its inconsistent performance in coding tasks.
Complex Reasoning and Math
Both GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra were put to the test with complex reasoning and math problems. When asked to solve a party handshake problem, Gemini Ultra provided a clear, step-by-step solution, while GPT-4 included unnecessary context before arriving at the correct answer. However, both chatbots struggled with more advanced math and logic problems, giving them each a 3-star rating in this category.
Extensions and Custom Functionalities
Google Gemini Ultra boasts a powerful extension system, allowing seamless integration with Google Workspace and YouTube. This enables users to pull data from documents, emails, and videos, providing a significant advantage in terms of accessibility and efficiency. GPT-4, on the other hand, offers a vast library of custom GPTs through its GPT Store. While these custom GPTs have the potential to be incredibly useful, especially for private team use, the current offerings in the public store lack the same level of practicality as Gemini Ultra’s extensions. As a result, both chatbots earned a 3-star rating for their unique functionalities.
Content Creation and Repurposing
Finally, we tested the chatbots’ ability to create and repurpose content for social media. When asked to generate a tweet based on a YouTube video script, Gemini Ultra provided more concise and engaging options, complete with relevant hashtags and proper formatting. GPT-4’s output exceeded the character limit and lacked the same level of polish. However, GPT-4’s custom GPTs can significantly improve its content creation capabilities, earning it a 3-star rating alongside Gemini Ultra.
Conclusion
After a thorough analysis and comparison across ten different categories, it’s clear that GPT-4 maintains a slight edge over Google Gemini Ultra. While Gemini Ultra excels in areas like research, extensions, and content repurposing, GPT-4‘s superior performance in text summarization, writing, multimodality, creativity, and coding gives it an overall advantage.
I do not even know how I ended up here but I thought this post was great I dont know who you are but definitely youre going to a famous blogger if you arent already Cheers.
Hi Neat post There is a problem along with your website in internet explorer would test this IE still is the market chief and a good section of other folks will pass over your magnificent writing due to this problem.
Thanks for the feedback i’ll check this problem and try to solve it as soon as possible